Dina was way unhappy when she found this out, and entered it into her custody plea, asking whether it "was appropriate for his ‘little girl’ -- to use his description of our child -- to be viewing the photograph in question."

Imagine you’re divorced, and you go to your ex’s place, and find a near-life size photo of a birthday-suit wearing guy/gal hanging on the wall. Would you, for one second, consider this normal? Way I see it, anyone over the age of 18 (excluding Hugh Hefner) who hangs a 50-by-60 inch color photograph of some naked person in their bedroom is flat-out weird, and I do not believe my innate fuddy-duddyness has anything to do with that opinion.

- Then there’s the question of just when, exactly, Dina found out her husband was a "gay American." She claims she didn’t find out until days before the announcement, a stance Big Jim agreed with -- until now. In Jim’s divorce papers, he claims Dina knew he was gay before they were hitched.

Here’s my take -- if she didn’t know, she had to have an inkling. I say this based on the fact every single working journalist I knew heard the rumors of McGreevey’s sexual orientation well before he became governor. There’s no way anyone can convince me she didn’t hear about them.

Anyway, all of this might be best summed up by a call we got here in the newsroom from an obviously-aged Massachusetts woman, who said she just had to call a New Jersey paper and ask if New Jerseyans were embarrassed by this whole mess.

Under the woodwork, back in the woodwork, under the boardwalk, wherever. But I agree. Enough is enough. Unless there’s still some really juicy stuff waiting to be unearthed. Then I’ll listen.

This is cache, read story here